Bruce Nunnally Posted May 28, 2020 Report Share Posted May 28, 2020 How Dual Volute Turbos Work In Chevy's Massive Four-Cylinder Engine (and in the Cadillac CT4-V) Quote Bruce 2023 Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing Follow me on: Twitter Instagram Youtube Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BodybyFisher Posted May 28, 2020 Report Share Posted May 28, 2020 Very interesting design, I am confused as to why the highway gas mileage is less than a 5.7L though in the Silverado. I suppose however its due to the Silverado's weight vs a 4 cylinder that has to work harder. Bruce Nunnally 1 Quote Pre-1995 - DTC codes OBD1 >> 1996 and newer - DTC codes OBD2 >> https://www.obd-codes.com/trouble_codes/gm/obd_codes.htm How to check for codes Caddyinfo How To Technical Archive >> http://www.caddyinfo.com/wordpress/cadillac-how-to-faq/ Cadillac History & Specifications Year by Year http://www.motorera.com/cadillac/index.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Nunnally Posted May 28, 2020 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2020 I added this comment to the video: For 2020 Chevrolet shows the 5.3L/8speed/2WD at 17/23 mpg (vs 5.3L/10speed/4wd 16/22), and the 2.7L T/8spd/2WD at 20/23 mpg. So the 2.7L is 17% better in city, same highway in the same configuration. An interesting factor on the 2.7L is the low-rpm torque, and what potential it has for tuning. I don't have comparative hp/torque charts for each of those engines, but I suspect the 2.7L drives better 5.3L: hp 355 / 265 @ 5600 (SAE certified) Torque 383 / 519 @ 4100 (SAE certified) 2.7L: hp 310 / 231 @ 5600 (SAE certified) torque 348 / 473 @ 1500-4000 (SAE certified) So the 5.3L makes more peak power, but the 2.7L probably feels more 'torquey' off the line. On the other hand, if they had put the 5.3L in the CT4-V people would be singing praises as a small sedan with a V8. Reference: https://media.chevrolet.com/media/us/en/chevrolet/vehicles/silverado/2020.tab1.html Quote Bruce 2023 Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing Follow me on: Twitter Instagram Youtube Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cdgrinci Posted May 28, 2020 Report Share Posted May 28, 2020 I'm guessing hwy mileage suffers in the Silverado because of the lack of aerodynamics as speed increases. Turbos can be efficient but only when they aren't called on (too much) for that extra needed power (kind of like a four barrel carburetor of old; efficient when power isn't needed but the extra power is available when the back two barrels kick in; my analogy to the turbo is the boost not used unless needed). At hwy speeds, I'm guessing that the 2.7 turbo is relying on boost to run at speed. The CT4 cuts a much better air path so it works much better at hwy. Well, that's my take on those numbers anyway. BodybyFisher 1 Quote Chuck '25 CT5, '04 Bravada........but still lusting for that '69 Z-28 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Nunnally Posted May 28, 2020 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2020 Perhaps at highway speed both multi-displacement engines are operating on two cylinders, the 5.3L on two 0.6625L cylinders, the 2.7L on two 0.675L cylinders, and so are pretty similar in fuel consumption. Quote Bruce 2023 Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing Follow me on: Twitter Instagram Youtube Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.