Bruce Nunnally Posted August 3, 2015 Report Share Posted August 3, 2015 Some how the ATS-V outperforms the Germans but because of the engine sound and lower redline (?) doesn't run away with the comparo, even with an as-tested price $10K less? Motor Trend: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/1507_bmw_m3_vs_cadillac_ats_v_sedan_vs_mercedes_amg_c63_s_comparison/viewall.html Quote Bruce 2016 Cadillac ATS-V gray/black Follow me on: Twitter Instagram Youtube Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cdgrinci Posted August 4, 2015 Report Share Posted August 4, 2015 (edited) That is a moronic reason to remove a vehicle, after it equals or exceeds in all of the performance categories, from not taking the top slot (sonic exuberance's). And at 10 grand less it should have been a slam-dunk. Edited August 4, 2015 by C&C Quote Chuck '19 CT6, '04 Bravada........but still lusting for that '69 Z-28 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.