Bruce Nunnally Posted March 1, 2010 Report Share Posted March 1, 2010 FINAL VERDICT: Three and one-quarter stars out of four. The 2010 Cadillac SRX is a picture-perfect adaptation of a luxury sedan on steroids. Comfort and handling are uncompromised, despite the bigger stance. However, the premium put on the turbo version may be a little too steep considering the best part of the SRX doesn’t need to be its engine. Read the article: http://www.aurorasentinel.com/articles/2010/03/01/living/car_care/doc4b8b5d5761ab2650796780.txt The 2.8L Turbo engine at 300 hp is an interesting option for the SRX, but does push the price up quite a bit. On the other hand although you have to wind the 3L up a bit it does move the SRX along, so the 2.8 Turbo is not an absolute necessity for most of the target audience probably. Bruce 2023 Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing Follow me on: Twitter Instagram Youtube Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cadillac Jim Posted March 1, 2010 Report Share Posted March 1, 2010 Well, maybe it's jut me, but I definitely would want the turbo if they don't offer the 3.6 liter DI V6 at 304 hp. Hey, I would look for a V version before I bought one, but that's just me. -- Click Here for CaddyInfo page on "How To" Read Your OBD Codes-- Click Here for my personal page to download my OBD code list as an Excel file, plus other Cadillac data -- See my CaddyInfo car blogs: 2011 CTS-V, 1997 ETC Yes, I was Jims_97_ETC before I changed cars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.