How Quickly They Turn

[BodybyFisher]

OK it's been 24 hours:

Health care foes compete to frame Kennedy's legacy

By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS, Associated Press Writer Julie Hirschfeld Davis, Associated Press Writer

Fri Aug 28, 9:39 pm ET

WASHINGTON – Liberals and conservatives, at odds over health care, are competing to use the legacy of Sen. Edward M. Kennedy to further their goals.

The left claims the Senate's liberal champion would have settled for nothing less than universal care and a new government-run insurance option. Republican foes of those ideas say the Democrats should take a lesson from Kennedy's gift for cutting a pragmatic deal and sacrifice some of their priorities in the interest of a bargain the GOP could support.

The White House appears intent on staying out of an unseemly political debate that's unfolding even before Kennedy is laid to rest, saying that President Barack Obama has no intention of refereeing disputes over the Massachusetts Democrat's memory.

"There will be a time when it's appropriate to have discussions on different ramifications, but I don't think anybody thinks that now is it," Bill Burton, a White House spokesman, said this week.

But even Obama's secretary of health and human services got into the act on Friday, telling seniors at a wellness center in a former theater named for Kennedy's family that the driving question on health care should be: "What would Teddy do?"

It's a question that defies a clear or obvious answer, and it may hold little relevance at a time when the health overhaul — and with it a major piece of Obama's own legacy — is teetering. But Kennedy's memory has become a kind of Rorschach test in the debate, with both sides seeing what they want to see in his example.

"There is going to be a battle over his legacy on health care," said Roger Hickey of the liberal Campaign for America's Future. Despite Republican contentions that honoring Kennedy means compromise, he said, "No one wants to pass a half-measure in tribute to Ted Kennedy. ... There will be a stronger push to pass comprehensive health care reform because of (his) passing."

Kennedy's friend, Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., has suggested naming the health overhaul legislation after Kennedy, and a liberal political action committee, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee PAC, has launched a Web site, http://www.HonorKennedy.com, to press for passage of legislation that reads like a Democratic wish-list and is anathema to GOP lawmakers. The group has gathered 40,000 signatures on a petition to be delivered to Capitol Hill Monday that urges senators to name the measure, which passed the Senate health committee last month, "The Kennedy Bill," and pass it — "and nothing less."

Such calls have drawn loud protests from some on the right, where conservative commentators are accusing Democrats of a crass effort to use Kennedy's death to further their political fortunes.

"They're going to turn this into the biggest political rally you've ever seen. They can't help themselves," said radio host Rush Limbaugh.

Conservatives have also tried to use Kennedy's death after a long illness to score their own points in the health care debate. Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee said Thursday on his radio show that it would be absurd to enact a far-reaching health overhaul in Kennedy's name when he "gave us the most shining example of why this particular bill is so bad."

Huckabee suggested that Democrats "would devalue older people's lives, or encourage them to accept less care to save money" and noted that Kennedy by contrast chose a costly operation and painful follow-up treatments in the face of his own terminal diagnosis. Democrats dispute that the elderly would be denied appropriate terminal care under their proposals.

Among Senate Republicans, some see Kennedy's death as a different kind of rallying cry — one for reviving a spirit of compromise that might prompt Democrats to put aside their favorite — but more politically difficult — ideas to attract GOP support.

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, an ideological adversary of Kennedy's who nonetheless had frequently teamed with him to cut deals on tough issues, said the colleague he knew would have at least been willing to consider tempering his party's demands if it meant a broad health care bargain.

"If (Kennedy) was there, even though he would want a single payer system and always wanted it, he would listen. I'll put it that way," Hatch said.

Former Sen. Bob Dole, R-Kan., said the two parties would be much closer to a deal had Kennedy not been ill and absent during most of the year's contentious debate. Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., said there would probably have been an agreement by now.

Some conservative analysts were even more certain.

"Ted Kennedy would have been willing to jettison the public plan. He would have been willing to jettison more controversial aspects of the health care bill to get it passed," said Brian Darling of the conservative Heritage Foundation.

Immediately after Kennedy died, Obama aides began worrying privately that the left flank of their party might try to use his passing as a call to action for a health care overhaul more to their liking. They were concerned such a push could produce a backlash and alienate Republicans the administration is desperately courting.

It's not at all certain that Kennedy's death will have an impact on the health care debate.

After all, he's been absent from the high-stakes negotiations over its key elements virtually all year. While his staff has been deeply involved in the talks, it's been clear since Kennedy's diagnosis last year with a serious form of brain cancer that he would not be a broker as he was on many previous debates on health care, education and immigration.

"This whole year has in essence been the post-Kennedy era," said Joseph Antos, a health policy analyst at the conservative American Enterprise Institute. "This isn't a matter of guessing what a great man would have done; this is a matter of solving real problems now."

Still, Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., a key player on the measure in Kennedy's absence, said his death should cool some of the heated rhetoric surrounding the issue.

"My hope is that this will maybe cause people to take a breath, step back and start talking with each other again in more civil tones about what needs to be done," Dodd said, "because that's what Teddy would do."

___

Associated Press writers Philip Elliott in Oak Bluffs, Mass., and Jim Kuhnhenn in Washington contributed to this report

[BodybyFisher]

Ted Kennedy Presented a Contrast to President Obama

Monday, August 31, 2009 10:46 AM

By: Ronald Kessler

Back in March 1996, my publisher threw a book party for my book “The Sins of the Father: Joseph P. Kennedy and the Dynasty He Founded.” Then 83, my mother, Minuetta Kessler, a concert pianist and composer, lived in Belmont, Mass. She boarded a plane at Logan International Airport in Boston to fly to Washington for the party.

On the plane, my mother spotted Sen. Edward M. Kennedy and introduced herself. She asked if he was flying to Washington for her son’s book party.

Kennedy was well aware that the book was not flattering to his father, Joe.

Based in part on the only interview ever given by the surgeon who performed the lobotomy on Joe’s daughter, Rosemary, the book revealed that for political reasons, Joe covered up the fact that his daughter Rosemary was mentally ill rather than retarded, as the family has long claimed. The book documented Joe’s alliance with the Mafia when he made his money as a bootlegger during Prohibition and payoffs he made to win the presidency for Jack. Based on interviews with her, it revealed Papa Joe’s affair with his Hyannis Port secretary, Janet Des Rosiers. The affair lasted nine years — three times longer than his affair with movie star Gloria Swanson.

Nevertheless, when my mother told him the details of the book party, Edward Kennedy was gracious. He said he wasn’t sure he’d be going, and he would have to check his calendar. He told my mother she must be very proud of her son. Later that day, I extended an invitation to the senator to attend the party at the Ritz-Carlton, but of course he did not attend.

Listening to Vice President’s Biden’s remarks about Ted Kennedy after his death, I was reminded of my mother’s encounter with the senator on the plane. Biden said of Kennedy, “He never was petty. Never was petty. He was never small . . . he made everybody he worked with bigger; both his adversaries as well as his allies.”

Then I thought of the contrast between Kennedy and President Obama, who never misses a chance to take a swipe at Republicans even at the most inappropriate times.

Speaking from Martha’s Vineyard after Kennedy’s death, Obama said, “The Kennedy name is synonymous with the Democratic Party, and at times, Ted was the target of partisan campaign attacks.” In much the same way, Obama’s pointless attacks on President Bush and his administration have become a tic.

Of course, Kennedy was a fierce partisan, but he never made the kind of gratuitous, petty remarks that have become Obama’s trademark. Moreover, unlike Obama, he worked with Republicans to develop legislation both sides could support. The No Child Left Behind Act is a shining example. Because it reintroduced phonics — or sounding out letters — to reading instruction, it has produced an improvement in reading scores.

Kennedy overcame the incidents that marred his personal life to become the most effective legislator in American history. By comparison, Obama seems small indeed.

Ronald Kessler is chief Washington correspondent of Newsmax.com. View his previous reports and get his dispatches sent to you free via

e-mail. Go here now.

© 2009 Newsmax. All rights reserved.