Jump to content
CaddyInfo Cadillac Forum

CTS aircharger test


Recommended Posts

Tested the K&N aircharger on my 2004 CTS 3.6L and put up some charts here:

http://www.caddyinfo.com/ctsairbox.htm

Results look fairly consistent, so I am content with the testing methodology as a whole. I am still digesting the results, but they do not show much improvement with the add-on.

The Aircharger does make a terrific howl at part and wide open throttle that may be worth the investment to some, and it does appear to help at 70+ mph, but at a cost getting off the line I'd say.

Comparison

Charts:

Time in seconds for each run:

Stock 1 Stock 2 K&N 3 K&N 4
mph sec sec sec sec
10 0.71 0.71 0.75 0.75
20 1.48 1.48 1.52 1.55
30 2.46 2.45 2.49 2.53
40 3.53 3.53 3.55 3.58
50 4.88 4.88 4.87 4.92
60 6.40 6.40 6.37 6.40
70 8.21 8.18 8.12 8.16

Wheel hp for each run:

Stock

1

Stock

2

K&N

3

K&N

4

mph hp hp hp hp
10 68 71 66 70
20 110 112 112 108
30 150 149 149 149
40 173 172 176 176
50 179 181 179 181
60 194 196 196 201
70 189 194 194 197

Peak HP for each run:

mph time dist hp
Stock

1

77.3 9.74 664 209
Stock

2

68.0 7.78 455 212
K&N

3

68.0 7.72 448 218
 K&N

4

66.4 7.46 420 217

 

Bruce

2023 Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing

Follow me on: Twitter Instagram Youtube

Link to comment
Share on other sites


 But wait there's more:

In order to ensure fairness, I reran the

K&N tests the next morning, to see how the aircharger might do with no

heat soak from traffic, cooler air, etc. Vehicle weight reduced 18 lbs on the AP-22 to account for 3 gal of fuel used.

Temperature 70 °F / 21 °C
Humidity 46%
Dew Point 48 °F / 9 °C
Wind North at 8 mph / 12.9 km/h
Wind Gust -
Pressure 30.13 in / 1020 hPa (Rising)
Conditions Partly Cloudy
Visibility 10 miles / 16 kilometers
Clouds

(Above Ground Level)

(FEW) : 25000 ft / 7622 

 

Run 5 Data: K&N Aircharger, 

mph s g ft hp
10 0.74 0.65 5 69
20 1.49 0.53 22 113
30 2.44 0.47 57 152
40 3.46 0.41 109 180
50 4.76 0.33 195 184
60 6.21 0.3 313 205
70 7.92 0.23 476 199

Run 5 Peaks:

Pk Power: 68.0mph 7.54s 438ft 215hp
Peak G: 13.3mph 0.96s 9ft 0.66g

Average: 155.8 hp

Run 6 Data:

mph s g ft hp
10 0.73 0.64 5 68
20 1.48 0.54 22 115
30 2.43 0.47 56 152
40 3.47 0.41 110 180
50 4.77 0.33 196 184
60 6.25 0.28 316 198
70 8.00 0.23 483 194

Run 6 Peaks:

Pk Power: 67 6mph 7.5 3s 436ft 213hp
Peak G: 17 1mph 1.2 3s 15ft 0.64g

Average: 157.4 hp

 

  Stock

1

Stock

2

K&N

3

K&N

4

K&N

5

K&N

6

Average

hp:

151.9 153.6 153.1 154.6 155.8 157.4
Average

of the hp values at 10-70 mph; one way to measure the overall

improvement of the adder.

My Conclusion?  still

thinking.  But the 6.21s at 69F with the K&N is a new fast time for

this car; the quickest previous time was with 1/2 tank less gas in the car,

and at 37F instead of 70F.

Bruce

2023 Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing

Follow me on: Twitter Instagram Youtube

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, I live in the Dallas area too. I wondering were you do all these test runs.

Andrew Morris

Dallas, Texas

1998 Black Eldorado:

full custom Borla exhaust

Custom intake

1500 watt Hifonics amp

3 12inch Boston Acoustic G2 subwoofers

I-pod integrated

18 inch Lexani Krystals with Z-rated tires

E&G classics Billet grill

BMW E36 Angel Eye Headlights

Ported SS heads

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At an undisclosed location B)

The important part from my point of view at this point is that I use the same location repeatedly, so that I limit the variables. Any flat, dry spot would work well though. Best is a location that allows 2-way testing over the same ground, but my test area is a deserted one-way section.

Bruce

2023 Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing

Follow me on: Twitter Instagram Youtube

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...