Jump to content
CaddyInfo Cadillac Forum

More leg room for the STS?


Bruce Nunnally

Recommended Posts

USA Today's STS review:

http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/review...12-16-sts_x.htm

• Back seat. Seems tight, even though Cadillac claims a generous 38.3 inches of rear legroom. "We're doing continuous improvement on both visual and actual comfort in back. We're working on a couple of things with the rear seat" that will be running changes during the '05 model year, says Mark Meyers, vehicle performance manager for STS. He wouldn't be more specific.

Bruce

2016 Cadillac ATS-V gray/black

Follow me on: Twitter Instagram Youtube

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I tried it out again Wednesday and "TIGHT" is definitely the right word for the back seat. While driving, I adjusted the front seat so it was comfortable. Iam about 5'11" and like to sit fairly close to the wheel. When I then got in the back seat behind the driver's seat, there was definitely a lot less room than in my 2000 STS in spite of what they say.

I thought I might treat myself to a new one as an Xmas present; but I just can't bring myself to do it.

My concerns:

1. RWD

2. "TIGHT" back seat

3. Small trunk

4. And I don't like the fact that you can pay from $40k to $69k all for something called an STS and nobody knows which one you're driving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...