Bruce Nunnally Posted March 22, 2010 Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 My current 2005 Cadillac CTS has a 3.6L V6 and is EPA rated for 16 city and 25 highway MPG using their current measure. For argument sake this yields a mixed-driving target of 19 MPG.I drive 15,000 miles a year, more or less. So with my 2005 Cadillac CTS I might expect to need 15,000 [...] View the full Blog Post Quote Bruce 2016 Cadillac ATS-V gray/black Follow me on: Twitter Instagram Youtube Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarlaValentine Posted March 22, 2010 Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 If I could AFFORD to pay the extra, then personally I would. If that extra 1,200$ a year would set me back, then I would go with the less power/better fuel economy. Just my $.02 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Nunnally Posted March 22, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 I think if I budgeted $1200 per year it would upset me less than thinking about it being another $100 /month, even though the outcome is the same. I am prejudiced against any 'recurring' cost. Certainly going from 30-something per fill up to 50-something per fill up can be unsettling. Quote Bruce 2016 Cadillac ATS-V gray/black Follow me on: Twitter Instagram Youtube Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.