We are in big trouble

[BodybyFisher]

December 14, 2009

We are in big trouble

By Larrey Anderson

Our country is in big trouble ... huge trouble. It is time that Americans took a hard look at our values, our conception of justice, and our standards for truth. This piece is intended as a first step in that direction.

1) Values

The story of Tiger Woods and his (now admitted) "infidelity" is everywhere. The Woods' story has piqued the prurient interests of America and the world. The story has dominated the mainstream media for days while the injustice being committed against our Navy Seals and the revelation of the computer code from the CRU (exposing the biggest hoax in the history of the world) have gotten scant attention.

Tiger Woods was on the cover of every magazine and tabloid that I saw while standing in line at the grocery store yesterday. Those publications and those stories are on the grocery stores' racks for a reason: Americans are buying them.

We are more interested in the private life of a guy whose claim to fame is that he can hit a little ball with a stick better than anyone else in the world (whoopee!) than we are about the destruction of our culture.

It is not Tiger Woods' moral values that concern me. (Celebrities of his stature face enormous temptations from all kinds of hustlers and harlots everyday of their lives.) It is the facts that while our freedoms and Constitution crumble before our eyes ... we are focused on Tiger and his bimbos.

This is our iniquity -- not Tiger's.

2) Justice

Meanwhile our politically correct military has arraigned two Navy Seals for allegedly punching Ahmed Hashim Abed in the lip. Abed was the terrorist who, several years ago, led the murder and the brutalization of the corpses of four Blackwater security people in Iraq.

Al Qaeda instructs its members how to claim and/or fake being tortured if a member of the terrorist organization is captured.

But Al Qaeda is not the real issue here. We are. America has become so politically correct that a terrorist/murderer/sadist, who bitches about his bloodied lip, might get some of the best and bravest men on this planet thrown into jail. Americans had better pay attention, and soon, to this nonsense.

Very special and highly trained military men, including these Navy Seals, are all who stand between a worldwide Islamic war of Jihad and you and me. If we do not rise up to defend these brave soldiers, and demand a full pardon and their immediate release, here is what will happen: Dedicated young men and women will refuse to put their lives on the line if a poke in the face, of someone who would kill them in a heartbeat, gets the soldiers time in the brig.

Would you take that job? Make those sacrifices? Put your life on the line? Would you complete your mission, catch the bad guy, and then be thrown into jail for your efforts? I wouldn't. No rational human being would.

Justice in the real world is not politically correct. "Pretty please" or "We respect your unmitigated desire (and efforts) to kill us" are not phrases that matter to a mass murderer. And the next time some whiny PC liberal tells me "We are better than they are," my reply is going to be, "Of course we are. That's why Ahmed Hashim Abed only got (allegedly) punched in the face. He wasn't shot in the head, beaten with sticks, burned, and hung on a bridge. How much better than they are do we have to be to make you happy?"

3) Truth

Since the release of the CRU documents that prove the fraud of the science behind man made global warming, Al Gore has said at least three times (Andrew Bolt of the Herald Sun puts it at four) that the emails and information were all ten years old. This is a lie. It has been repeated again and again by Al Gore. Some of the emails are less than two months old. And dozens upon dozens are less than ten years old. And everyone -- but Al Gore -- knows it.

Watch the video of the CNN interview with Gore here. One reporter does say to Gore, as a kind of aside, "Some of them [the emails] were from ten years ago, but many of them were far more recent than that."

Gore ignores the statement. Neither of the two reporters further disputes Gore's "ten year old" fabrication. No follow-up challenge from the CNN reporters to Gore's out right lie. None.

The mainstream media has downplayed the significance of the CRU documents. The headline of a recent AP story proclaims that the science from the CRU was not faked. Really? As (among others) Marc Sheppard, Lord Monckton, and I have proven the CRU findings most certainly were doctored. The raw date was manipulated to "prove" that the world is exponentially warming. There is no doubt about this.

And still, the mainstream media has not challenged Al Gore on the blatant absurdity of his claim that the documents were at least ten years old and have no real impact on the AGW debate. CNN did ask him to recite his new poem on the impending doom of mother earth. See that video here. (But not if you have recently eaten a meal. You could lose it.)

John 8:32 states the following:

Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.

The corollary of this brilliant piece of scripture should also be written. It would go something like this:

If you ignore the lies, the lies will imprison you.

Wake up America. The time for the truth to set us free is growing very, very short.

Larrey Anderson is a writer, a philosopher, and submissions editor for American Thinker. He is the author of The Order of the Beloved, and the memoir, Underground: Life and Survival in the Russian Black Market

Reference/Credit

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/12/we_...ig_trouble.html

[BodybyFisher]

If the above does not shake your foundation, this will

Newsmax

China's Gen Chi: U.S. Easily Defeated

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:33 PMBy: Lev Navrozov

From 1993 to 2003, Chi Haotian was the Minister of National Defense (read: “of world aggression”) of the People’s Republic of China (read: “of the Post-1949 slave-state of China”). He is now 80 years old, and since 2004 he has been vice chairman of the Central Military Commission of China.

In 2005, his speech was reprinted by The Epoch Times, an independent Chinese newspaper, published abroad. His speech details the annihilation of the West and talks about world domination.

In my columns, I wrote about how Chi depicts China’s future war for its world empire as gleaned from his speech.

The first target will be the United States as the most powerful of the free (and hence enemy) countries, whereupon all the other enemy countries will be easier targets.

As for the United States, up to two-thirds of its population will be poisoned (chemical war) or infected with mortal diseases (biological war), and all of their property will be transmitted to the new settlers (the Chinese) as to the superior race. One-third of Americans will be left alive to be servants of the new superior race.

None of this is new. The owners of the slave states of old wanted their slaves to get a share of the enemy wealth to be loyal to them, their owners, and interested in their victory.

It would be wrong for the owners of China to spread such information as official: even a slave state is supposed to behave internationally in peacetime as an advanced democracy. Thus, China has prepared for world domination secretly.

Hence the spreading of savage slave-state information was entrusted to Chi, for which purpose he had even been demoted in 2004, before he made his scandalous slave-state speech in 2005.

Besides, consciously, mankind should believe in the official propaganda of China and, subconsciously, in its subhuman superpower, able to create a Chinese world empire.

This is why in 2004 Chi ceased to be the minister of National Defense of China and in 2005 was the vice president of the Central Military Commission, and made his speech about annihilating chemically and biologically two thirds of Americans. Well, one-third should be spared to prepare the former United States for the new settlers (and later act as their servants).

In the parade marking the 60th anniversary of the People’s Republic of China, the owners of China demonstrated some of the latest weapons, instead of concealing them until the war Chi had described in his speech of 2005.

Let the world know that China can develop, produce, and use all the weapons that the United States can, but since the population of China is 1.3 billion and that of the United States is slightly more than 300 million, all those who studied math at elementary school can figure out the final outcome.

But since every American is free to think and speak, many Americans would rather think and speak about their ability to afford to buy a pair of cashmere socks they have seen on sale this morning than about the United Stated being annihilated by China.

As for American “top experts on China,” they found Chi’s description of China’s conversion of the United States into part of China’s world empire to be a laughable forgery of someone (like myself) describing Gen. Chi Haotian.

Here it is necessary to understand the role of American higher school education, granting degrees to a graduate, which announces one as an expert on China.

Now, do these degrees ensure an expert’s ability to think? Well, this would be redundant, of course. Just as elementary-school math enables anyone to be an expert in everything that can be counted, so too the knowledge of a high school graduate certified by degrees enables people to discuss whatever this knowledge certifies to be known.

Before 2005, hardly anyone of the American experts on China had heard of Chi Haotian, minister of National Defense of China.

True, that happened in slave states of old. But few experts knew this term “slave state,” or have heard a lecture on slavery, which can flourish today, as it did thousands of years ago.

But well-known events disproved the experts’ conclusion that Chi’s speech is a forgery. Chi has been as grandly visible after 2005 as he had been before. The Epoch Times reprinted his speech in 2009, with its introduction.

To my search “Chi Haotian Today,” Yahoo! responded with 18,300 results.

There is one of Chi’s predictions that is undeniable: a Sino-American war, and the later it occurs, the greater will be the military superiority of China owing to its incomparably larger population, which can be converted into the developers and users of the latest modern weapons.

Any advantages of the United States? Let us take, for example, the latest major war of the United States: the war of the United States and its allies against Iraq, a technologically backward country, whose population then was 26 million.

Today’s surveys of the war, like “George W. Bush and the Iraq War” in Yahoo!, leave no doubt that the war was an insane rigmarole, complete with “a movement to impeach George W. Bush,” though his stunts were more like insanity than just stupidity, and the pertinent topic is, what to do if the elected U.S. president is clinically insane.

It is obvious that the American culture in spheres like warfare creates not intelligence but titles, and among those the title of “U.S. president” is especially troubling, since the American revolutionary method of conferring this title by the will of a majority of direct voters is on the verge of insanity, since the more people think alike, the lower the level of their mental normality, sinking into insanity, like Obama’s “thinking” at the beginning of his presidency that the United States and the slave state of China are “partners.”

It is tragicomical that by electing the U.S. president, a majority of voters who elected him are also sure that thereby they also elected the country’s top military man of genius, while his actual mental level may be insanity.

You can e-mail me at navlev@cloud9.net.

© Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Reference/Credit

http://newsmax.com/navrozov/china-haotian-...12/10/id/339799