Jump to content
CaddyInfo Cadillac Forum

Cadillac BLS


Recommended Posts

http://www.wired.com/news/technology/autotech/0,71200-0.html

This is a Cadillac that I would buy:

PARIS -- As gas prices continue to skyrocket, U.S. Cadillac buyers may well cast an envious eye across the Atlantic, where the luxury automaker's first European-made model is setting new companywide benchmarks in mileage and handling.

In many respects, the first European-made Caddy is a Saab with a Cadillac body. Not only is the BLS produced at General Motors' Saab headquarters in Trollhättan, Sweden; it also has the same platform as the Saab 9-3.

While driving along the often-curvy roads between Paris and the Brittany Coast in France, the Cadillac BLS certainly did not feel like any other Caddy I had driven in the past. Conspicuously absent are the floating-sensation and lack of handling for which Caddys, as well other American luxury cars, are famous. Instead, the BLS' steering is crisp, clean and direct. I felt comfortable taking the BLS around curves at great speeds while remaining in firm control. I would have been much less inclined to race along France's windy roads behind the wheel of a U.S.-made Cadillac, and would not even consider such a feat in the more top-heavy Escalade SUV.

The BLS' engine options range from 1.9 to 2.8-liter engines with maximum horsepower varying from 150 to 255. With a best-case-scenario acceleration of zero to 62.5 mph in about 6.9 seconds, the BLS is certainly not lacking in the power department, either. Comparatively, the U.S.-made CTS with a 2.8 V-6 engine does zero to 62.5 mph in 8.2 seconds.

The Cadillac BLS I tested, with a 1.9-liter direct-injected, turbocharged diesel engine, turned out to be a study in fuel efficiency compared with its U.S. counterpart. It offered an average fuel-consumption rate of 6.1 liters of gas per 100 kilometers. Comparatively, the CTS 2.8-liter made-in-America Caddy consumes about 11.7 liters of gas per 100 kilometers, while the Cadillac Esplanade SUV guzzles 18.9 liters of gas over the same course.

Another Cadillac first is that the BLS is available with a diesel engine. This is an almost unthinkable concept in the United States where diesel-fuel cars and trucks have never caught on, especially in the luxury-car segment.

While the BLS' improved handling was mostly welcome, it does come at a price.

The car is rigid and stiff compared to the ride the great American Caddy offers. But while the BLS may be stiff, it certainly is quiet. When I was revving the engine to over 6,000 rpm on the highway, for example, I could barely hear it.

So will the BLS model one day show up in U.S. dealerships? Not likely: When the BLS was unveiled as a concept car at the Geneva Motor Show in 2005, General Motors made it clear that it was designing a European-only Caddy to compete in the mid-sized, luxury-car segment.

However, some of its technologies, such as the turbo-tweaked engine that accounts for the BLS' low fuel consumption, could eventually find their way into made-in-America Cadillacs. General Motors is adopting a more centralized approach to R&D as part of its massive restructuring program now in progress.

General Motors vice chairman Bob Lutz, for example, specifically singled out Saab, noting there has to be more of an overlap between Saab's development resources and those of General Motors. But for the time being, the European Caddy, with a starting price of about $37,000 in Britain, is intended to compete with the likes of the Audi A4 or the BMW 3 Series on the European carmakers' home turf.

If you really want to make people safe drivers again then simply remove all the safety features from cars. No more seat belts, ABS brakes, traction control, air bags or stability control. No more anything. You'll see how quickly people will slow down and once again learn to drive like "normal" humans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I agree. I would like to see the BLS added to the US Cadillac line up.

There have been rumors that we will see the BLS here in the future.

I think at issue is that a less expensive Cadillac does not fit all that well in the GM branding scheme in the US. The CTS, starting at ~$30K, is already low in Cadillac's assigned premium role.

But, since the BLS is based off the Saab 9-3, with a nice 2.8L turbo version of the 2.8L V6 CTS base engine, it would seem easy to federalize here. It is front wheel drive, which some would prefer as an option.

The base Saab 9-3 here starts at $26.6K. The base CTS 2.8L is $29.99K. So the US BLS would seemingly need to slot between those two, which is fairly narrow.

A convertible BLS would be even more fun, but the convertible Saab 9-3 starts higher at $38.5K.

Bruce

2023 Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing

Follow me on: Twitter Instagram Youtube

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. I would like to see the BLS added to the US Cadillac line up.

There have been rumors that we will see the BLS here in the future.

I think at issue is that a less expensive Cadillac does not fit all that well in the GM branding scheme in the US. The CTS, starting at ~$30K, is already low in Cadillac's assigned premium role.

But, since the BLS is based off the Saab 9-3, with a nice 2.8L turbo version of the 2.8L V6 CTS base engine, it would seem easy to federalize here. It is front wheel drive, which some would prefer as an option.

The base Saab 9-3 here starts at $26.6K. The base CTS 2.8L is $29.99K. So the US BLS would seemingly need to slot between those two, which is fairly narrow.

A convertible BLS would be even more fun, but the convertible Saab 9-3 starts higher at $38.5K.

I think at issue here is the matter of diesel. For some reason, the US government (and in the background the oil companies too I'm sure) are dead set against bringing diesels into the USA. Some models have made it in, but I'm sure those manufacturers have had to pay a price for the access to the US market.

MINI Cooper has a diesel, model D One, which gives nearly 60 mpg, has a 100hp engine that has great acceleration and as we all know, diesel engines just seem to last forever. When I emailed MINI asking them why their diesel model was not for sale in the USA, they said the US government wouldn't allow the car to come into the country.

I believe there's an agenda going on now with the government where the people are being forced to use gas that costs double of what it did a few years ago, but burns up twice as fast. Once again, we are being forced to subsidize the oil companies. :angry:

If you really want to make people safe drivers again then simply remove all the safety features from cars. No more seat belts, ABS brakes, traction control, air bags or stability control. No more anything. You'll see how quickly people will slow down and once again learn to drive like "normal" humans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I understand it, our diesel fuel here in the US was high in sulfur content. New legislation required low sulfur content in diesel as of this month (June 2006). So now we should see more diesel engines here.

For example, with the previous high-sulfur diesel fuel, the VW car diesel engines put out a white smoke which was felt to be unacceptable. With the new fuel the smoking should be "cured".

There is a station that carries diesel fuel on my commute, but it often costs more than premium per gallon, so it does not seem like a savings opportunity to me. Perhaps cost per mile it is less.

I agree that diesel engine reliability is often better, although GM has made some disasterously bad diesel engines in the past.

Bruce

2023 Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing

Follow me on: Twitter Instagram Youtube

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...